3.2 Lateral inhibition

A simplified concept of receptive fields (RFs) was introduced in Introduction 2., and the classical way of mapping receptive fields in 3.1. So far, you have learned about the location and size of RFs. Here we look at the structure of RFs. According to the traditional view, the receptive field is defined as the area on the receptor surface within which stimulation elicits neuronal responses. For now, we will stay with the traditional view, and define RF structure in two dimensions only: the two dimensions of space on the receptor surface.
fig 3.2/1 

lateral inhibition
(ref 12)
fig 3.2/2 

lateral inibition
(ref 2, 185, 7.5)
Two cones, A and B, and lateral neural connections (highly schematic). Inhibitory connections are indicated by minus signs and green. What happens if the overall stimulation is increased? The signals from each of the receptors tend to increase, but so does their ability to inhibit each other. The net result is that the overall illumination is largely ignored. What happens if the illumination at only A is increased?The enhanced signal from A further inhibits that from B. However, because B does not receive any extra illumination, its inhibitory effect on A remains unchanged. The effect of an increased illumination at A is thus an increased signal from the more highly stimulated A and a decreased signal from the more inhibited B. The brain is made more aware of this difference in illumination at A and B than it would be without lateral inhibition. The result is that an edge, where the light intensity changes rapidly from brighter to darker, is made more noticeable (edge enhancement), while an overall illumination change is not so apparent. 
fig 3.2/3 

ON center ganglion cell
(ref 3, 67, 2.35)
Response of a retinal ganglion cell in the cat's retina to stimulation (a) outside the receptive field (area A on the screen); (b) inside the excitatory area of the cell's receptive field (area B); and (c) inside the inhibitory area of the cell's receptive field (area C). The excitatory-center-inhibtory-surround receptive field is shown on the far right without the screen.
fig 3.2/4 

stimulus size increases
(ref 3, 67, 2.36)
Response of a cell with an excitatory-center-inhibtory-surround receptive field (ON center cell). The area stimulate dwith light is indicated by the shading, and the response to the stimulus is indicated by the records below each receptive field. This cell responds best to stimulation that is the size of the receptive field center. (In a simple way, when light falls within the excitatory region, it will add to the total stimulation, and increase the firing rate of the cell. When light falls in the inhibitory region, it will subtract from the total stimulation, and decrease the cell's firing rate.) 
fig 3.2/5. 

simultaneous  contrast
(ref 3, 71, 2.41)
Simultaneous contrast. The two center squares reflect the same amount of light into your eyes but, because of the simultaneous contrast effect, look different. Psychologically you can say that the effect is caused by the difference in the backgrounds. But what is the physiological mechanism behind this effect? 
fig 3.2/6 

Hermann grid
Explanation of the Herman grid based on center-surround antagonism, and receptive field size. 
links to related illusions:
Fading spot
Steps
Hermann grid
Simultaneous contrast
 



Already preparing for the exam? Here is some help: see if you can define all the keyterms and keywords. If you can  answer the study questions it means that you understood the lecture and the chapter in the book. The exam questions, however, might be more specific - see examples.

KEYTERMS
    lecture: center/surround receptive field,  lateral inhibition, contrast, ON-center receptive field, OFF-center receptive field.
    book, Chapter three: Bloch's law, crowding effect, dark adaptation, duplex theory, eccentricity, Hermann grid, intensity, lateral inhibition, lightness, lightness contrast, Mach bands, mesopic, photopic, scotopic, photon, Purkinje shift, resolution, retinal ganglion cells, Ricco's law, spatial summation, temporal summation, visual acuity
 
 

STUDY QUESTIONS:

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS: FINALIZED for this semester, Feb 2003