• Event Date: October 26, 2006
  • Event Start Time: 12:00 PM
  • Event End Time: 7:00 PM
  • Event Location: Seton Hall University, Department of Psychology
  • Event Semester: Fall 2006
  • Event Contact: Dr. Kelly Goedert
  • Event Extra info: <a href="http://pirate.shu.edu/~goederke/ ">Dr. Kelly Goedert</a>
When drawing causal inferences from contingency information, participants tend to devalue a moderately effective cause when it is learned about in the presence of a highly effective cause. Although some of this devaluing can be attributed to controlling for alternative causes, devaluing beyond that which can be accounted for by controlling for alternative causes occurs. �In Experiment 1, I will present a evidence that such devaluing (termed discounting) is cognitively dissociable from controlling for alternative causes. In Experiments 2 and 3, I present evidence consistent with the idea that discounting is a judgment bias that can be at least partially overridden.